Unicorns: Biblical vs. Pink

If you read the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible, you will come away thinking that the ancient Hebrews believed in unicorns.  This is understandable since there are nine verses referring to unicorns: Numbers 23:22, Numbers 24:8, Deuteronomy 33:17, Job 39:9 & 10, Psalms 22:22, Psalms 29:6, Psalms 92:10, and Isaiah 34:7,

Many atheists take potshots at Christian Biblical literalism by pointing out that taking the Bible literally would entail believing in ridiculously fantastic creatures such as unicorns.  Some Atheists get great joy out of showing Biblically naive believers that their beloved Bible has unicorns populating it.

However, examination of the Hebrew makes it clear that the KJV is just a mistranslation.  Wheew, Christians are off the hook on this one — not that there aren’t a lot more hooks out there waiting for them !

Here are the linguistic facts:

  • The Hebrew word translated “unicorn” in the KJV is רְאֵ֖ם (re’em) which in the TaNaK (Hebrew Bible) actually means “wild bull” or “ram” and is translated correctly is most other Bibles.
  • The Latin translation of the same word in the Vulgate is  “rhinocerotis”
  • The Greek word in the Septuagint is μονοκέρωτος (monokέrōtoς) which means “one” (mono) “horn” (kerotos).  This mistranslation of re’em and may have caused of the misunderstanding.  You see, a “rhinocerotis” has one horn.

Anyway, please cut the Christians a break — except those who worship the KJV, of course!  There are a lot more substantive debates to be had.  And besides, approaching conversations about the Bible in this manner, disobeys what I call the Debator’s Golden Rule which calls for helping the other side present their strongest argument.  And more than all this, and the point of this post, is that keeping all the unicorn talk clear-headed allows us to save the unicorn for its most important task: debunking the burden of proof of fantastical notions (covered in another post).  For that purpose, Atheists have created the notion of the Invisible Pink Unicorn (Wiki) as well as the Flying-Spaghetti Monster (wiki) for which we are all deeply grateful.  We don’t want to confuse our conversations with Christians by discussing biblical unicorns when we have the much more useful invisible pink uniform waiting patiently in the forest ready to come to our rescue !  🙂


Notes & Pic Acknowledgement:


Filed under Philosophy & Religion

10 responses to “Unicorns: Biblical vs. Pink

  1. Wow! You have a photo of the Translucent Pink Unicorn, which has very rarely been caught on film! The Invisible One, of course, is everywhere.

  2. Boz

    “except those who worship the KJV, of course!”

    I was thinking this before I read it! Good article.

    You are right sabio – there are lots of other things in the bible to laugh at apart from unicorns.

  3. @ LB : Actually (shhhhh, its a secret) she is not translucent — that is the actual invisible pink unicorn but taken with my Kirlian camera system which I augment with a wolframite lens !

  4. Ian

    I’ve never worked out why KJV-onlyists don’t find it a compliment when you tell them that the KJV is one of the greatest achievements of English literature 🙂

  5. Pingback: doubting the unicorn « a time to rend

  6. Pingback: Which Bible?? - Page 2 - Christian Forums

  7. It says OX not unicorn. Go get phonics* And find the Lord!!

  8. Me

    All of you people talking badly about the kjv need to stop. Unicorn means ‘one horn’ what’s wrong with calling a rino a unicorn?

  9. @ Me,
    You need to read the post to answer you silly question.

Please share your opinions!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s