3 Quarks Daily bans Sabio Lantz

3 Quarks Daily3 Quarks Daily is an excellent e-magazine which offers readers a daily fine selection of readings from around the web which you may otherwise not get a chance to read. Occasionally they also offer space for their own writers to do an article. Today, one of their writers, Fausto Ribeiro, did a post entitled, “A Universe from Nothing? Or: Desperately Seeking Transcendence in a Materialist World.”  Well, the title accurately tells you where that post is going.

It was a sappy, weak post setting up straw-man criticisms of scientists and doing this all digitally while pontificating about the evils of digital entertainment. One commentor succinctly responded with, “Jeez” — a rather generous comment, in my opinion.

But S. Abbas Raza, one of their “moderators”, didn’t think so and vehemently replied:

“I have no idea what that means. In any case, I will say this only once: either leave comments that engage the piece in some substantive (and civil) way, or you will be banned. Understood? Good.

I am very tired of people acting superior and contemptuous toward our writers. You don’t like what we publish? Go somewhere else. Or engage our writers in a polite way, even if you don’t agree with them.

We don’t need people rolling their eyes at us like 13-year-olds.”

Reading this, I also then decided to criticize but the article and Raza’s critical attitude toward disagreeing commentors.

Then, in my e-mail, I see this reply from Raza:

“Three or four of our readers above seem to have liked the article very much. What I fail to understand is why certain people are so sure of their own opinions that they can’t simply move on to something they do like instead of staying and insulting the writer. Not every piece is to everyone’s taste. Why is that so shocking? Can you name any reputable magazine or journal where you like everything they publish?”

When I look back at the site to respond to this, I see that my comment had been deleted. Indeed, even this last comment of Raza was self-deleted. And when I tried to reply again, and I see that I am now banned from the thread.

So in protest to 3 Quarks Daily, I am posting what I would have posted:

(1) I think it is fantastic that folks like the article.
(2) Are you saying, look, on 3 quarks daily we don’t want any negative comments but just compliments? If so, you need a comment policy.
(3) This writer is “so sure of [his] own opinion” and we are responding to his public declaration of it. I would think 3-quarks-daily would encourage open debate.
(4) I can not name another reputable magazine who would like to shut down disagreement like you would.

Interestingly, 3QD is in the middle of a fund raising campaign and Raza just did this post asking for financial support. In his plea for money, Raza tells us that 3DQ offers “intellectual refuge” – sure, if refuge means being able to hide from criticism. He says, “We know you like 3QD (and we are extremely flattered) because you have just told us so.” Sure, and that you censor disagreement.

So, are you considering supporting 3 Quarks Daily? Well, I actually was, until today.


Filed under Blogging, Events

7 responses to “3 Quarks Daily bans Sabio Lantz

  1. I took a look at that 3QD page. And I saw a lot of tossed word salad, but no useful content that I could see.

    I did not bookmark the site.

  2. yeah, it was essentially pseudo-intellectual confusion

  3. Good response. There is no reason to censor ANY comment, unless it is an ad hominem attack, or a racist/homophobic rant.

  4. Sweet, getting banned should lead to a spike in readership (for you).

  5. @ Charles,
    Well, if they had a policy that said, “No disagreeing with our authors”, I would understand. But then, I’d never visit their site.


  6. This thread seems to be dead, but I thought I’d comment anyway. I have had far worse experiences at other websites and have been banned from The New York Review of Books blog. They moderate every single comment and also defend their writers. I recently started reading 3QD and find it much more open so far.

    Every site has to maintain some order, and occasionally the editors or moderators might go overboard or exercise bad judgment. On sites like the NYRblog your comments might not be posted at all, and there is nothing you can do about it.

  7. @ Paul,
    Thanx for contributing – I always monitor threads.
    Yeah, my mistake to think that they were blog-like.
    But then I was also banned on a liberal Christian site for simply quoting Pew statistics about Muslims. Go figure.
    Well, its their blog — but I don’t read them now, and I quickly recommended others not to too.
    Likewise, with 3QD. I don’t read their pet author posts — just links to good sites.

Please share your opinions!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s