Religion-Free Moral Signaling

Functions of ReligionReligious people often use their religion to signal to themselves and others that they are moral, upright, trustworthy and more.  But religion-free people (atheists, agnostics etc) also send out moral signals.Here are some secular methods to signal your virtues:

  • Politics: (depending on the audience, declaring your political allegiance can have this affect.
  • Diet:  Vegetarians often reek of this.  (I am a former vegetarian, see my confession here)
  • Philosophy:  Talking about ethics and morality are a signal, no matter how false.  (see prev. post)
  • Sports:  Heck, even declaring oneself a sports fan can signal identity, bonds and allegiances (all part of morality).
  • Consumption Habits:  Environmentalists, Recyclers etc use their positions as signals

You see, we all signal our morality in some way.  Religious folks usually include this signaling in their abstract package of religion as I illustrated in the diagram to the right (from this post).  By using religion as their packaging, they feel they can amplify their signal. The problem with religious vs. secular signaling is that, for the most part, religions discourage questioning of the package, of the values or of any doctrine.  Whereas secular folks, though signaling, are much more open to discussing and questioning their signals — but that is an intuition, I can’t quote an article to support my impression.

Question to readers:  Name others secular signals you can imagine.  What do you feel about my last claim?

— See my other posts on Morality here.


Filed under Philosophy & Religion

4 responses to “Religion-Free Moral Signaling

  1. I’m not sure why those things in your list are necessarily moral signals. If you’re a vegetarian, you might have good reasons for being one. You might not disclose that you’re a vegetarian unless you have too, such as when you’re eating at a function or you’re asked directly.

    I think talking about ethics is not really a signal but an intellectual exercise that we tend to do. We question our own ethics.

  2. @Cranium
    Yes, you are right:

    (1) BEING a vegetarian does not necessitate signalling any moral superiority at all. BUT, have you ever heard someone declare themselves vegetarian with an air of moral superiority or moral sensitivity. Indeed, many do it to make themselves feel good about themselves. Does this make it wrong? No, of course not. But it is important to recognize the signaling.

    (2) Discussing Ethics does not have to be a signal either, but it can. I will let you imagine the scenarios.

    Do you ever feel that you do or have done moral signaling?

  3. From your diagram…both behaviojr control and tribal bonding are aspects of a larger funtion : social control by the group in power. Zbut is ‘moral signaling’ the right term? We exchange signals about our position versus the univerze (likes, beliefs, affiliations, power, and preffered lifestyle) every time we interact with someone new or anew. Is moral signally not just a part of this larger signalling? If i signal that i,m not to be triffled with… Is itmeant as moral signally? Just wondering if the word itself ought not be revisited in your interesting blog.

  4. @ egyoung,
    We could organize these different functions in many different ways. This is just meant to illustrate the basket of functions.

Please share your opinions!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s