Naturalists can get frustrated talking with Creationists, emoting as follows:
“They are so uneducated !”
“They are so ignorant !”
“Our education system is so bad !”
“We need more science education !”
It is not just Creationists that outrage Naturalists, but also those who, though they may say they agree with some evolutionary insights, still claim that “Evolution is still just a theory” and “There is no evidence of macro-evolution” or “Man could not evolve from Apes.”
Naturalist have every right to be frustrated and outraged with these ideas. Especially since many of those voices are hurting others, if not in outright twisted practices based on these misunderstandings of nature and knowledge, but by obstructing the progress of science in terms of government policies and money spent on science. Yet in some Naturalists there is an ironic lack of understanding about the real enemy of evolution — the human brain.

HT: Click for Link
The human brain has thousands of different heuristic modules which unconsciously crank out conclusions for us.(1) We are then deluded into thinking that we made these conclusions consciously.(2) These heuristics evolved over millions of years to solve simple daily survival and reproduction issues and only have outputs with accuracies which are better than the heuristics they replaced. Thus, our brain modules are not truth machines, instead our brains produce approximate results which work well enough but may not be accurate. In other words, we live only on approximations or guesses, but sufficient guesses for genetic prosperity over the long run — for now, at least !
So, to acquire better approximations of reality we have ironically used our minds to developed checks on our mind’s simple heuristics — science is one of those methods. But science takes a great deal of discipline and has been slowly built over decades by the cooperation of many and the sharing of information. The discipline and cooperation needed to overcome our own simple, yet often self-deceptive heuristics is daunting. It is no small task to accurately learn science, math, statistics, research skills, economics and much more.
Naturalist should not under-estimate the task needed to learn science. Many Naturalists are naturally bright in the analytic sense and really have not had to make much effort to learn this way of thinking. Others have been born in fortunate surroundings and circumstances and have been given much time and resources to learn. These Naturalists should not take credit for their fortune or assume their own traits to be hard earned virtues. But some Naturalists have worked hard to build these new modules in their minds. These un-natural Naturalists are perhaps, more than others, better able to understand the effort needed to learn real science.(3)
Our society needs people with many skills such as in sales, farming, building, service and many others which do not require the same sort of analytic training that science research requires. We should struggle for a society that supports science but realistically remember that real scientific thinking doesn’t happen until after graduate training in most people. And remember that it is not the obligation of everyone to learn science, any more that it is your obligation to learn gardening, woodwork, martial arts, hunting, knitting, cooking, sport trivia or any other countless areas of knowledge.
Ironically, evolution’s worse enemy is evolution. Evolution has given us brains which are unfit to understand evolutionary principles. We must fight and claw for every ounce of science we have. And hopefully we build a culture that supports those who find this struggle to be their careers or avocations without looking down on those who “just don’t get it.” The challenge is that some of the folks who “don’t get it” are also our opponents. But to better fight our enemy it is best to understand our enemy. And so, we need to remember, Creationists and Naturalists have a common enemy — our own minds.
——-
Notes:
(1) Self-Disclosure: I am assuming Computational and Connectivism Theories of Mind.
(2) Self-Disclosure: I am assuming a view of consciousness shared by Wegner in The Illusion of Conscious Will.
(3) When I say “real science”, I contrasting it with two other common uses of the word which are not what I mean by the word:
a) “science” dogma = the simple body of knowledge now commonly held by the majority who consider themselves allies of science.
b) “science” applications = the practice of applying algorithms and methods established by those who using science dogma.
Sorry if this is too abstract — perhaps more later.